Tiny Predators, Big Implications: Lab Modules Using Genlisea to Explore Evolutionary Innovation
labevolutionundergraduate

Tiny Predators, Big Implications: Lab Modules Using Genlisea to Explore Evolutionary Innovation

eextinct
2026-02-13
10 min read
Advertisement

Use Genlisea to teach convergent evolution and morphological innovation. Ready-to-run undergraduate lab modules, data workflows, and assessments.

Hook: Turn a classroom gap into an active research experience with one of botany’s strangest predators

Undergraduate instructors and lab coordinators tell us the same things: students crave authentic research experiences, courses lack turnkey modules that connect morphology, evolution, and experimental methods, and reliable, classroom-ready resources are scarce. In 2026, Genlisea—the subterranean “corkscrew” carnivorous plant—offers a compact, safe, and scientifically rich case study that solves these problems. This guide translates recent public interest and 2025–2026 research advances into five scaffolded lab modules you can run across a semester.

The evolution of a teaching tool in 2026

Genlisea received renewed attention in late 2025 and early 2026, appearing in both mainstream reporting and new studies that highlighted its morphological innovation (highly modified, soil-buried trap leaves), unusual life history traits (reduced or absent roots in some species), and genomic oddities (nuclear genomes among the smallest reported for flowering plants). Educators can leverage this scientific momentum and a growing toolbox—low-cost field sequencing, community bioinformatics platforms, and AI-driven image analysis—to create modules that teach evolutionary theory, lab skills, and data literacy.

Why Genlisea works as a lab case study

  • Clear learning hooks: carnivory is intuitively interesting; the idea of a plant hunting underground sparks curiosity.
  • Accessible morphology: traps are dissectible and visible at stereo- and compound-microscope levels.
  • Multiple entry points: morphology, ecology, phylogenetics, microbiomes, and experimental evolution can all be taught around the same organism.
  • Feasible logistics: living material is available from nurseries and tissue-culture collections; experiments can use safe microbial or microinvertebrate prey.

Learning goals & course-aligned outcomes

Design modules so students can leave with both conceptual and practical mastery.

  • Explain convergent evolution of carnivory across plant clades and identify morphological innovations that enable underground trapping.
  • Perform dissections and microscopy to document structure–function relationships.
  • Design and run controlled feeding trials and analyze ecological data.
  • Build comparative phylogenies using barcodes and public sequences to test evolutionary hypotheses.
  • Use amplicon or metagenomic data to explore the trap microbiome as a functional partner in digestion.
  • Plan and interpret a semester-long selection experiment on microbial communities linked to trap function (a practical model of experimental evolution).

Module designs: week-by-week, lab-ready

Module 1 — Morphology & Microscopy (Weeks 1–2)

Objective: Document trap anatomy, identify candidate morphological innovations, and practice imaging and measurement.

Materials: Genlisea plants (2–3 species if possible), stereomicroscopes, compound microscopes, dissecting tools, camera adapter or phone mounts, aqueous dyes (e.g., toluidine blue or neutral red for contrast), digital calipers, lab notebooks.

  1. Intro (30 min): Brief lecture on carnivorous-plant diversity and how Genlisea fits into convergent evolution stories.
  2. Dissection lab (2–3 hours): Students work in pairs to carefully open traps, identify trap mouth, constriction zones, inward-pointing hairs, and digestive chambers. Guide students to preserve one specimen in ethanol for imaging and one for live observation.
  3. Imaging & measurement (1–2 hours): Capture stereo and compound images. Measure trap length, entrance diameter, and chamber volume estimators—record data in a shared spreadsheet.
  4. Deliverable: Short morphological report with annotated images and a hypothesis about how structure relates to function.

Assessment: Image quality rubric (resolution, scaling, labelling), accuracy of features identified, clarity of hypothesis.

Module 2 — Functional Ecology: Feeding Trials (Weeks 2–4)

Objective: Quantify prey capture rates and test environmental factors that influence trapping success.

Rationale: Genlisea captures microfauna (protists, rotifers, nematodes) via passive traps. Because prey turnover and microcosm methods are fast, this module yields measurable results within a few weeks—ideal for semester timeframes.

Materials: Cultures of safe microfauna (e.g., Paramecium, Tetrahymena, rotifers like Brachionus), microbeads (for negative-control trials), pipettes, microtiter plates, stereomicroscopes, timers, environmental chambers (or incubators), pH strips, salinity meter.

  1. Design (class session): Students develop experimental treatments (e.g., prey type, prey density, pH, substrate moisture). Teach blocking and replication.
  2. Execution (2 weeks): Introduce prey to trap microcosms at set intervals; sample traps to count captured prey using dissection microscopy or DNA metabarcoding (see Module 4 for sequencing option).
  3. Analysis: Calculate capture rates, perform ANOVA or GLM to test treatment effects, and visualize with boxplots or rate curves.
  4. Deliverable: Lab report presenting statistical results and an ecological interpretation of the trap’s adaptive value.

Safety & ethics: Use non-pathogenic, contained cultures. Do not release organisms into drains; autoclave or bleach before disposal.

Module 3 — Convergent Evolution: Comparative Phylogenetics (Weeks 3–6)

Objective: Test hypotheses about the number of independent origins of carnivory and the evolutionary relationships between Genlisea and other carnivorous plants.

Approach: Combine new classroom-generated sequences with public data from GenBank to reconstruct trees. This module teaches DNA extraction, PCR, sequence analysis, and phylogenetic interpretation.

Materials: DNA extraction kits (plant-friendly), PCR reagents, universal chloroplast primers (e.g., rbcL, matK), gel electrophoresis, access to a sequencing provider (Sanger) or on-site MinION for classrooms that have invested in portable sequencing (a major 2025–2026 trend in field pedagogy).

  1. Wet lab (2–3 sessions): Extract DNA from Genlisea leaf tissue and amplify barcodes. Emphasize sterile technique and controls.
  2. Sequencing & QC (asynchronous): Submit to a provider or run MinION; teach students how to evaluate read quality and trim sequences.
  3. Phylogenetics (2 sessions): Align sequences (MAFFT), build ML trees (IQ-TREE or MEGA), and test trait evolution with ancestral-state reconstruction (ape, phytools in R).
  4. Deliverable: A 5–7 page report linking phylogenetic topology to convergent evolution hypotheses (e.g., independent origins of traps), with figures and code snippets.

Teaching tip: Provide a prebuilt script for alignment/tree construction but require students to interpret the results and run sensitivity tests (different markers, taxon sampling).

Module 4 — Microbiome & Gene Expression (Advanced; Weeks 4–12)

Objective: Explore the functional partners—microbial communities and plant gene expression—that enable digestion and nutrient uptake.

Why this matters: Many carnivorous plants rely on microbial communities to break down prey. Recent classroom deployments (2025–2026) show that 16S/18S amplicon sequencing and low-cost RNA workflows are viable in undergraduate settings when partnered with sequencing cores or educational sequencing grants.

Project options:

  • 16S/18S amplicon sequencing of trap extracts to profile bacteria and protists; analyze with QIIME2/DADA2 and visualize in phyloseq.
  • Targeted qPCR of candidate digestive enzymes (secreted proteases) to compare fed vs. starved traps.
  • Introductory RNAseq pilot: pool traps and run low-depth libraries to identify upregulated genes after feeding (requires sequencing budget).

Deliverable: A reproducible Jupyter notebook or R Markdown report showing community composition, differential abundance, and a short biological synthesis. Use metadata best practices and consider automated extraction tools (see integration guides) so student datasets are reusable.

Module 5 — Experimental Evolution via Microbial Selection (Semester-long)

Objective: Model evolutionary change in trap-associated microbial communities under different prey regimes or simulated environmental stressors.

Rationale: True evolutionary change in long-lived plants is slow. However, the trap microbiome turns over rapidly, making it a tractable proxy for studying selection, drift, and functional innovation in a semester.

  1. Set up replicate microcosms inoculated with trap extracts; impose selection regimes (high-protein prey vs. plant-derived carbohydrate feed; acid stress; repeated desiccation).
  2. Serial transfer weekly for 10–12 weeks, with periodic sampling for amplicon sequencing and functional assays (e.g., protease activity).
  3. Analyze community shifts, functional potential (via PICRUSt or shotgun metagenomics if budget permits), and trait responses across treatments.

Deliverable: Group poster or primary-style paper that argues whether and how functional traits evolved under selection in the microbiome.

Data analysis workflows, reproducibility & assessment

Use modular, reproducible workflows so students with varying coding experience can participate. Suggested stack:

  • Data cleaning and statistics: R (tidyverse, lme4, car), or Python (pandas, statsmodels).
  • Phylogenetics: MAFFT, IQ-TREE, R packages ape and phytools.
  • Microbiome: QIIME2 or DADA2 + phyloseq for visualization.
  • Differential expression: DESeq2 for RNAseq; qPCR analyses with standard curves in Excel/R.
  • Reproducibility: GitHub Classroom for code submission; R Markdown/Jupyter for reports.

Assessment rubrics should weigh experimental design, data quality, statistical reasoning, and evolutionary interpretation equally. Provide exemplar datasets for early practice and blind peer-review exercises to build critical evaluation skills.

Logistics, sourcing, and safety

  • Sourcing plants: Use reputable carnivorous-plant nurseries or tissue-culture banks. Avoid wild collection without permits; several Genlisea species are range-restricted.
  • Growing conditions: Low-nutrient media (peat:sand or peat:perlite mixes), distilled water, high humidity, bright indirect light. Many Genlisea are temperate to tropical—match species to your institution’s capabilities.
  • Animal cultures: Only use non-pathogenic, contained microfauna. Obtain institutional approval for their use and disposal procedures.
  • Permits & ethics: Check CITES listings and local conservation statuses in 2026; Genlisea conservation concerns are increasingly monitored as more habitats face wetland loss.

Classroom variants & remote-friendly options

Not every program can maintain live plants or sequencing. Alternatives that maintain learning goals:

  • Use curated image datasets (microscopy stacks, trap cross-sections) and have students do virtual dissections and measurements.
  • Assign publicly available sequence datasets from GenBank for the phylogenetics module.
  • Run simulated feeding trials with time-lapse videos and AI-derived prey counts (2025–2026 advances in computer vision make automated scoring feasible).
  • Partner with local botanical gardens or community science projects for hands-on field days; these local partnerships mirror the "stall-to-studio" community model used by some outreach programs (community hubs).

Connection to paleontology & deep-time perspectives

Although carnivorous plants have a sparse macrofossil record, the theme of convergent morphological innovation is central to both neontology and paleontology. Use Genlisea to teach how function can reappear across distant clades and how structural innovations can be inferred in extinct lineages by analogy and fossilized plant tissues. Integrate a small assignment where students map morphological traits onto a time-scaled phylogeny and compare modern adaptive scenarios to mass-extinction-driven radiations discussed in paleobotanical literature.

Practical tips from implementations in 2025–2026

  • Start small: pilot one lab section with Module 1+2 before scaling up.
  • Leverage low-cost tech and sequencing partnerships; by 2026, many regional sequencing centers offer education rates.
  • Use student roles (PI, data manager, wet-lab lead) to mirror research teams and build transferable skills.
  • Integrate story-driven assessment: ask students to write a grant-style proposal for the next-season follow-up study.
"Genlisea flips common expectations about plant behaviour and form; using it in the classroom gives students a laboratory-sized window into convergent evolution and experimental research methods." — educator summary, 2026

Actionable checklist before you start (instructor quickstart)

  • Order plants and microfauna 6–8 weeks before term.
  • Reserve microscopes and sequencing slots; request institutional biosafety review for animal cultures.
  • Prepare a one-page protocol packet for each module and a shared spreadsheet for data aggregation.
  • Seed GitHub Classroom and provide starter R/Python notebooks for analyses.
  • Draft assessment rubrics and a timeline for deliverables (reports, posters, code submissions).

Expect growing integration of genomics and AI in undergraduate labs. Two specific trends will increase classroom capability:

  1. Portable sequencing and cloud pipelines will make student-generated genomic data routine for term projects.
  2. AI-assisted image analysis will automate behavioral and capture-rate scoring, freeing time for deeper interpretation and hypothesis testing.

For Genlisea modules, those trends mean students can complete end-to-end projects—from field- or greenhouse-based sampling through sequencing and publishable-quality analyses—within a single semester.

Actionable takeaways for instructors

  • Use Genlisea to teach convergent evolution, morphological innovation, and experimental methods in a unified course sequence.
  • Start with morphology and feeding trials to build skills, then layer in sequencing and microbiome modules in later weeks.
  • Model experimental evolution using fast-turnover microbial communities associated with traps, not the slow plant generation times.
  • Leverage 2026 tools—portable sequencing, cloud bioinformatics, and AI imaging—to make authentic research feasible and scalable.

Resources & suggested readings

  • Recent popular coverage (Jan 2026) highlighting Genlisea’s subterranean traps and public interest in novel carnivory strategies.
  • Classroom sequencing providers and regional cores offering educational rates (search local university cores).
  • Open-source tools: QIIME2, DADA2, MAFFT, IQ-TREE, phyloseq, DESeq2, and R tidyverse.

Call to action

If you’re an instructor ready to pilot a Genlisea module, download the free instructor pack at extinct.life (protocols, starter datasets, assessment rubrics, and dataset templates). Share your classroom results with our community dataset repository so other educators can reuse and build on your student-generated data. Together we can make convergent evolution and experimental evolution accessible, rigorous, and exciting for the next generation of scientists.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#lab#evolution#undergraduate
e

extinct

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-13T01:54:38.623Z